Editorial Roundup: United States

Recent editorials in the United States and abroad have discussed various topics including the U.S. economy, congressional expulsion, and the Voting Rights Act.

The Washington Post highlights the positive state of the U.S. economy, with low inflation, job growth, and a consumption boom. However, the article also notes that consumers may need to scale back on spending, and growth may slow in 2024. The job market is identified as a key indicator to watch, as hiring slows down and unemployment rates could rise. The Federal Reserve is expected to halt interest rate hikes, and discussions arise on when interest rate cuts may occur. The article concludes by suggesting that a bipartisan debt commission could help address long-term fiscal challenges.

The Wall Street Journal focuses on the expulsion of George Santos from Congress after he faced federal charges. The article highlights that while it is essential to maintain the presumption of innocence, waiting for due process and a criminal conviction could enable scoundrels to linger in office. The article raises concerns about the precedent set by expelling a member of Congress without a conviction and warns that this could be abused in a polarized political climate. The importance of leaving such decisions to the courts and voters is emphasized.

The Los Angeles Times discusses a recent federal appeals court decision that could impede the enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The court ruled that only the U.S. attorney general, not private individuals, can file lawsuits to enforce the Act’s key protections. The article argues that the Supreme Court should overturn this decision if it is appealed, noting the historical importance of protecting voting rights. The dissenting opinion is highlighted, stating that federal courts have considered Section 2 cases brought by private plaintiffs in the past, and Congress has affirmed their role through committee reports. The article highlights the ongoing struggle to ensure equal voting rights and the importance of preserving the ability for private parties to sue under the Voting Rights Act.